Regulile Curții de Apel în cererea de proprietate asupra unui superyacht | SY News ep271

Regulile Curții de Apel în cererea de proprietate asupra unui superyacht |  SY News ep271



#superyacht #superyachts #yachts #boats 00:00 Alfa Nero Un pas mai aproape de a fi vândut? 05:21 Alăturați-vă nouă pe Patreon! Alăturați-vă eSysman Superyacht Club pe Patreon! https://www.patreon.com/esysman Obțineți acces exclusiv la videoclipuri nemaivăzute până acum, la fragmente de locații filmate în întreaga lume în timp ce filmați superyacht-uri și multe altele. De asemenea, discutați direct cu noi și puneți întrebări pentru întrebări și răspunsuri viitoare și sugerați subiecte pentru videoclipurile viitoare. Canalul de știri SuperYacht | Alatura-te aici! https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXuvvrj1tZ5oFYMRrFXhwFw Link către canalul de știri! 3 Minute de Maritime https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV1dJufuBCnn0H8h_PEJoDQ Aboneaza-te acum! https://youtube.com/esysmansuperyachts Urmărește-mă pe: Instagram – http://instagram.com/esysman_superyachts Twitter – https://twitter.com/eSysman Facebook – www.facebook.com/eSysman NOTIFICARE DE PRESĂ Toate imaginile sunt drepturi de autor al canalului de Youtube eSysman Superyachts. Nicio imagine nu poate fi reprodusă sau reutilizată fără permisiunea expresă. Dacă utilizați orice informație din acest videoclip, vă rugăm să creditați canalul eSysman SuperYachts. Dacă doriți să utilizați fotografii preluate din videoclip, contactați-ne în avans. Trebuie acordat și creditul canalului de youtube. Dacă doriți fotografii sau videoclipuri pentru utilizare sau sindicare, vă rugăm să ne contactați. Muzică de – Epidemic Sounds https://www.epidemicsound.com/referral/arptj5/

source

38 thoughts on “Regulile Curții de Apel în cererea de proprietate asupra unui superyacht | SY News ep271

  1. Yacht abandooned in port. Antigua makes proper call for "who owns it" to let owner identify themselves and take their boat. Nobody shows up.
    Sanctions lifted, yacht sold, and all of a sudden someoe claims onwership pf yacht. Sorry, but legitimate onwer who had abandoonned yacht should have showed up when the government asked for legitimated pwne to show up. As long as the government followed due process, it is normal for appeals to fail.

  2. i would never buy 'alfa nero' even if i had 500 billion usd .. part because of who owned it, but mainly because the boat has been the topic since almost 2 years maybe .. i wouldn't be comfortable having breakfast in that boat – my opinion only .. 🙂

  3. Is Ms Guryeva paying the yacht's current bills? Has she paid all the accumulated fees and salaries owed? Seeing as the yacht was seized for non-payment of bills, it shouldn't make any difference who exactly failed to pay those bills.

  4. Why can’t they just sanction the trusts that are associated with the the Russians? Wouldn’t that cover a broader asset base of them. Then it would stop things like this happening…..

  5. This set a precedence for other private yachts that any government can seize; imagine if Bill Gates’s Yacht was seized or Steve Jobs's Yacht was confiscated because he was assumed to have facilitated the “illegal criminal occupation of Iraq” just because he was American.

    This ruling will blur the distinction between Private and government property.

    Going to be great to watch further court battles.

    Best to place the Yacht in a Company Name and then Lease the boat to yourself for the period.

  6. If you don't pay your bills, your boat gets seized. This case seems rather simple, despite all the court and political posturing. If they want their boat back, they should have come forward and paid their debts when they had the chance.

  7. No you wouldn’t give police information like that. Maybe in your country but not in America. I have every right not to say anything in helping a police investigation in to me or my family.

  8. Short aside:
    2:49 If your daughter owned a car and the police called you and said "Do you own that car?" you wouldn't say "No, I don't own it," you'd say "It's my daughter's car."

    Incorrect. I'd say it wasn't my car, if I'd say anything at all. Don't talk to the police without a lawyer!

  9. Because Antigua is a sovereign nation and has already changed it's law once allowing for a sale there is no reason they cannot change their law again, even adding a one off 'exception law' to settle the case if they wish to. Making your own rules is literally a core part of the definition and remit of being a sovereign state. So if they attempt to use the legal system or framework to delay and slow down the case the government could simply pass a targeted law saying "the outcome of case X to do with asset Y is Z, all legal matters are resolved and cannot be litigated again" and that would be that. I'm sure it would still be relatively slow to change the law this way, but likely faster than the case itself. It takes a truly expensive asset to make it worth a government's time to do this, but this is an example of why it is a bad idea to contest a sovereign government directly

  10. The Antigua courts should require any appeal only if the appellant deposits the maintenance and past due amounts. The Antigua can return the deposited amount if the appellant is unsuccessful.

  11. Seems to me that if she is claiming it, she should be required to make all the bills current and pay everyone. THEN come back and discuss ownership.

  12. You are absolutely incorrect about the lawyers saying that he didn't own the yacht but should have said his daughter did. No lawyer would volunteer that information as they are under no legal obligation to do so.

Comments are closed.

Follow by Email
YouTube
YouTube
WhatsApp