De ce guvernul Regatului Unit nu permite plecarea acestui superyacht nou-nouț de 50 de milioane de dolari

De ce guvernul Regatului Unit nu permite plecarea acestui superyacht nou-nouț de 50 de milioane de dolari



#superyacht #superyachts #yachts #boats Salut tuturor. Aceasta este noua noastră funcție pentru povestea lungă și fără sfârșit a lui M/Y Phi. Închis la Londra de aproape 2 ani, pentru că proprietarul… bine este rus. Acesta este singurul motiv pentru care guvernul Regatului Unit a venit pentru a ține acest iaht nou-nouț atât de mult timp. Vorbim despre eforturile proprietarului de a-și elibera iahtul, alături de un nou dosar în instanță. Alăturați-vă eSysman Superyacht Club pe Patreon! https://www.patreon.com/esysman Obțineți acces exclusiv la videoclipuri nemaivăzute până acum, la fragmente de locații filmate în întreaga lume în timp ce filmați superyacht-uri și multe altele. De asemenea, discutați direct cu noi și puneți întrebări pentru întrebări și răspunsuri viitoare și sugerați subiecte pentru videoclipurile viitoare. Abonați-vă la canalul nostru de podcast The Yacht Report Podcast @yachtreportpodcast De asemenea, pe Spotify și Apple Podcasts Canalul de știri SuperYacht | Alatura-te aici! https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXuvvrj1tZ5oFYMRrFXhwFw Link către canalul de știri! 3 Minute de Maritime https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV1dJufuBCnn0H8h_PEJoDQ Aboneaza-te acum! https://youtube.com/esysmansuperyachts Urmărește-mă pe: Instagram – http://instagram.com/esysman_superyachts Twitter – https://twitter.com/eSysman Facebook – www.facebook.com/eSysman NOTIFICARE DE PRESĂ Toate imaginile sunt drepturi de autor al canalului de Youtube eSysman Superyachts. Nicio imagine nu poate fi reprodusă sau reutilizată fără permisiunea expresă. Dacă utilizați orice informație din acest videoclip, vă rugăm să creditați canalul eSysman SuperYachts. Dacă doriți să utilizați fotografii preluate din videoclip, contactați-ne în avans. Trebuie acordat și creditul canalului de youtube. Dacă doriți fotografii sau videoclipuri pentru utilizare sau sindicare, vă rugăm să ne contactați. Muzică de – Epidemic Sounds https://www.epidemicsound.com/referral/arptj5/

source

33 thoughts on “De ce guvernul Regatului Unit nu permite plecarea acestui superyacht nou-nouț de 50 de milioane de dolari

  1. This is a very iconic yacht and its futuristic lines are also classic lines. This is a yacht that will hold a unique place in the yachting world for decades.

  2. 495gt – some creative volumetric accounting going on there, perhaps. I know She is skinny at 9.73m beam and has a shallow draft of 2.15 for her length, 58.5m, but that seems very low.

  3. Two of many possible reasons: the owner has pissed off someone in the UK government, or the government knows something that they are not willing to disclose that Putin’s regime is well aware of.

  4. Somethings are not as they appear. The long time line suggests that there are things happening that are not in public view. Those things we will never know. I do think that this is the most beautiful looking yacht of all.

  5. The UK Government have double standards one minute they were welcoming Russian money into London, who incedently were allowed to buy up half of London properties! We should more concerned about our Government in London wasting our tax payers money funding overseas wars and selling arms to countries who are causing genocide. Grant Shapps is a self glorified bafoon.

  6. Come on we all know 100% UK Gov is Americas little bitch and all it took was a phone call from US State Dept .."get that boat" forget any legal problems we'll back you if you lose in Court ..we'll invent something.

  7. It’s a likely possibility there’s more to this story. ESysman is merely reporting the facts in the public domain. And it would seem nobody is ashamed of themselves.

  8. There should be a marina 'jail' for these vessels then. Put them where they would be safe, secure and well looked after during the legal processes. Just my opinion.

  9. So the billionaire gets his yacht cared for by the UK Gov. for two years? Not sure who is playing who here. With shell companies ownership can be disguised. The UK may have a very good idea of what is going on before having proof. What billionaire Russian was allowed to be created without the aid of the Russian Govt? They are created and destroyed by its needs and whims, IMO.

  10. "fits the criteria"
    "Sends a signal to other rich Russians"

    I'm not fond of Russia or powerful Russians (for reasons not connected to this whole Ukraine thing) but this is corruption at it's finest

  11. This all about the UK government not wanting to loose face, it is all about the minister involved not wanting to loose face and his complete lack of shame for his incompetency and all about showing the unprofessional NCA trying to look for a needle in a haystack to justifying the seizure and failing (that is why they are dragging their feet on releasing their findings). Considering the British legal system as disgustingly inept as you can get (Post Office Workers – Hepatitis Scandal to name a just a couple of failures), this yacht will eventually sink at it's moorings and the tax payer will be used to pay the loss to the yacht owner.

Comments are closed.

Follow by Email
YouTube
YouTube
WhatsApp