De ce nu navighează containere ultra mari către Statele Unite?

De ce nu navighează containere ultra mari către Statele Unite?



De ce nu se livrează în SUA? Ce se întâmplă cu transportul? 1 februarie 2024 În acest episod, Sal Mercogliano – istoric maritim la Universitatea Campbell (@campbelledu) și fost marinar comercial – a discutat despre motivul pentru care nu există nave de containere ultra mari (nave capabile să transporte mai mult de 16.000 TEU – unități echivalente cu douăzeci de picioare) ) navighează spre Statele Unite. #supplychain #shipping #containerships Asistență Ce se întâmplă cu transportul prin: Patreon: www.patreon.com/wgowshipping Twitter: @mercoglianos Facebook: @wgowshipping E-mail: mercoglianosal@gmail.com Trafic maritim www.marinetraffic.com Evoluția containerelor https: //transportgeography.org/contents/chapter5/maritime-transportation/evolution-containerships-classes/ Lista celor mai mari nave containere https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_container_ships

source

47 thoughts on “De ce nu navighează containere ultra mari către Statele Unite?

  1. During the greatest decline in history we have the greatest inequality to overcome. The super wealthy and underprivileged poor

  2. the world is not a globe , it's flat and round like a plate.. further south you go the longer the distance around in a circle you must go . we have two moons

  3. Here's an idea close the port's build. What we need in our own country. You buy china made crap you're funding they're military. Some day that's gonna bite us in the ass.

  4. the long term goal of the globalists doesn't require the large container ships. Their goal for the last 70 years was to move the cheap work force to the US. First step was to gradually move all manufacturing out of the US then slowly bring it back as cheap labor becomes available. Well folks its almost here. Ten million strong in the last 3 years alone. Over 20 million available now. When the projected workforce size is achieved they will shut down the border. What they needed was a president that was corrupt enough to be controlled . He couldn't have any other source of income and the globalist have enough information on him to have him put in prison at any time they wished if he didn't do as he is told. That man is Joe Biden……

  5. It's just too bad that with NAFTA, during the Clinton administration, much of the manufacturing in the US went off shore. No ships equals no goods. There are now ruins of large city and small town manufacturing plants strewn across the USA. Ruins.

  6. If made in Mexico is good for the trade distribution network in the US then they should not discriminate (discrimination is institutionalised as very immortal in the US) with made in Mexico people distributing themselves throughout the US and in strong hold state's of the US

  7. Maybe its Time AMERICA STOP BUYING COMMUNIST TRASH,WE DONT NEED THEM AND AMERICA CAN START BUILDING AGAIN,MAKE AMERICA GREAT AND MAKE OUT STUFF IN AMERICA,MADE IN AMERICA IS WHAT THE WORLD REALLY WANTS, ANOT cheap CHINA MADE CRAP!!!!!

  8. This Can Only Mean that the USA is Not a Large enough Trader to be bothered sending a Large ship.
    It Confirms that USA is a Non-Productive country, nothing it has is wanted and no one wants to trade with USA.
    Theft of Other Nations Funds and the Tons Crash

  9. America made everything worse by bombing the Yemenis. The Yemenis were very clear that they were ONLY targeting ships going to Israel, but OH NO stupid American government has to drop some bombs to 'solve the problem' which then turned US and UK shipping into Yemeni targets too. Well done USA for turning what was a minor problem into an international one. When will America learn that dropping bombs is not intelligent or effective foreign policy?

  10. Interesting as always Sal. Thx! There have been a few ships we’ve worked at TraPac and NYK (LA/LB) that couldn’t reach the cans offshore. Couldn’t get the shark cage on top either.

  11. You think maybe the fact that they are refusing our payment in Treasury Bonds has anything to do with it? They will no longer accept our currency,

  12. How many of the U.S. ports will be able to dredge deep enough to accommodate the largest ships ? I am someone who is not in the industry and am just asking. There has to be a limit to how deep each of these ports is able to dredge.

  13. So the question arises, if Ever Forward, which we know goes into Baltimore is a 52ft draught, and the new 24k TEU ships are 55 ft draught, it appears the only issue getting into Baltimore would be the cranes. Did Baltimore not upgrade in size with the new cranes they got within the last year or so? Or is the Bay Bridge also an issue?

  14. Man loved this education. Question, or perhaps thought, given the massive operation of bringing goods from all points of the world. Why not invest in modern manufacturing plants in each country that would produce the vast majority of their goods on their soil for their people. Just a thought.

  15. The U.S doesn't have the money to improve infrastructure… our government is more concerned with supporting lost causes like Ukraine and illegal immigrants.

  16. Yeah, and what does building ports that can handle bigger ships do, but make us even more dependent on foreign countries, rather than start building what we need HERE‼️

Comments are closed.

Follow by Email
YouTube
YouTube
WhatsApp