Inlocuitor de iaht Royal Britannia | The Crown (Imelda Staunton, Dominic West)

Inlocuitor de iaht Royal Britannia | The Crown (Imelda Staunton, Dominic West)



Regina Elisabeta (Imelda Staunton) împărtășește cu familia regală ideea primului ministru pentru un înlocuitor pentru iahtul regal Britannia, anunțând retragerea acestuia după mulți ani de serviciu. Din sezonul 5, episodul 10: Dezafectat, transmiteți în flux The Crown pe Netflix! https://www.netflix.com/us/title/80025678 The Crown se bazează pe Regina Elisabeta a II-a ca tânăr proaspăt căsătorit, care se confruntă cu conducerea celei mai faimoase monarhii din lume, în timp ce stabilește o relație cu legendarul prim-ministru Sir Winston Churchill. Imperiul Britanic este în declin, iar lumea politică este în dezordine, dar se deschide o nouă eră. Scenariile cercetate cu măiestrie ale lui Peter Morgan dezvăluie călătoria privată a Reginei în spatele fațadei publice, cu o sinceritate îndrăzneață. Pregătește-te să vezi în lumea râvnită a puterii și privilegiilor din spatele ușilor încuiate ale Westminster și ale Palatului Buckingham. #TheCrown #TheCrownSeason3 #QueenElizabeth #ImeldaStaunton #SceneCity

source

22 thoughts on “Inlocuitor de iaht Royal Britannia | The Crown (Imelda Staunton, Dominic West)

  1. I have to say that the royal yacht was an expense that
    neither the BRF or the UK government could afford. As
    the saying goes
    " A (pleasure) boat is a hole in the water into which
    . one pours one's money "

    I can understand why, as Britain was once premier
    naval power of the world, that the BRF would have a
    yacht, "back in the day" Also, air travel on luxury
    planes didn't exist under after WW2.

  2. They could EASILY sell off one diamond of the crown jewels and pay off for a new yacht. Why on earth did they think asking more money from the public is the right thing to do when they have enough savings to finance their bloodline for generations to come?

  3. I visited the yacht in Edinburgh harbor a few weeks ago. A really nice thing, although nowhere near luxurious by today's superyacht standards. But even then: to pay for it with public funds? No way.

  4. Notice Charles is the only one who can accept that the monarchy must change if it wants to remain. For all his faults with Dianna he was always a populist (as far as a king can be anyways) and has always been a supporter of modernization of the monarchy. Even now as King, Charles has made a great effort to shift the perception of the monarchy from being a stuffy class of poms to being more like that of his Grandfather, a servant of the people and a citizen-king.

  5. Is the Royal Yacht Britannia, the same ship that Prince Charles rode on to participate in the 1997 handover of Hong Kong (Britain's last overseas Colony that marked the end of the British Empire)?

  6. Remember, this is drama. I stopped watching it because they had the Queen querying her education and it actually wasn't the Queen but Princess Margaret. Brittania was special to the Queen because it was the only place on Earth where she could truly relax. She was in tears at the decommissioning ceremony. She can't sell the Crown Jewels – they belong to the State. When Windsor Castle caught fire, the Government expected us to pay (not the Queen), they told the Queen that we would pay so imagine the egg on their faces when we said we were not going to pay! There were six funding streams such as Historic England etc and Queen Elizabeth chipped in significantly but the Crown won't tell you that! Prince Andrew ran in and out with the firefighters to save the priceless artworks that belong to the nation. That is you.

  7. I don't get the big deal, we waste so much taxpayer $$$$ on pointless military expenditures here in the USA. $70 million is a drop in the bucket, not even a rounding error in terms of the national budget in a country the size of England. It gives the country(UK) a black eye that they are a 4th rate world power at best, some navy you have when you can't provide your head of state a proper ship.

  8. How many millions did Andrew cost the Queen to pay off the scandal? But he carried some paintings out of a castle? What a good boy he is.

  9. If this is an accurate.
    The Queen made the right decision.
    She didn't want Blair's motto on Hull.
    That's Political.
    A corporate would be endorse the brand.
    Philip figured " he was entitled to their entitlements.
    Charles was like King Edward selling out the CROWN!!!!!

  10. I'm a staunch royalist but also believe that if Her Majesty wanted the Britannia so much then why couldn't she fund it herself? Like it or not the money wasn't in the public coffers to spend on it. Or alternatively they could have downsized to a more manageable and modern yacht 🤷‍♂️

  11. The Royal Yacht came into service at pretty much the same time that ER ascended the throne. As such, the ship was bound up in her identity as monarch.
    The reason she wanted the ship to be refitted and continued as her platform of transport as paid for by the government (aka taxpayers) is the same reason the US government pays for the aircraft known as Air Force One: as a showcase of the government’s head of state.
    It was a good idea for the government to persuade ER to decommission the Yacht and use it as a museum ship to showcase the history of ER’s reign.

  12. Typical none of The Queen. The Queen didn't press the government for a new yacht. When she wanted one for private holidays she chartered one. The facts are in the public domain for anyone to see.

Comments are closed.

Follow by Email
YouTube
YouTube
WhatsApp