Ce s-a întâmplat pe super-yacht-ul Bayesian din Italia în timpul nopții fatidice din august? Multe mistere par să fie încă nerezolvate, dar un NOU VIDEO documentează noaptea de la începutul furtunilor până după ce Bayesianul a dispărut. 🍵 MULȚUMESC foarte mult pentru susținere, este foarte apreciat și ajută foarte mult! https://www.buymeacoffee.com/silki Alăturați-vă canalului meu pentru a avea acces la avantaje: mai multe informații aici: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDVWclHr8ZeOIVJ3JqhVoEw/join #Superyacht #Bayesian #Sinkingofyacht #Yachtsinks #italy # Tornado #yacht
source
Yacht Bayesian: Misterul celui de-al doilea izbucnire la 37 de minute după scufundare! Traumă la cap – Fără înec?
34 thoughts on “Yacht Bayesian: Misterul celui de-al doilea izbucnire la 37 de minute după scufundare! Traumă la cap – Fără înec?”
Comments are closed.
This ebegger knows nothing that we all do not know it is just a matter of how much can i get from ebegging
Excellent point about the boat builder making you the owner/captain learned and knowledgeable of sailing that boat!!
The boat had a downflooding angle of 45 degrees. If you want facts, this tells you everything you need to know about this unsinkable yacht.
Ask the experts who don't have vested interests
Some of you get told a story (by the media) and blindly assume it is the de-facto event
Discern, think, analyze
First version of the events was an unusually strong storm WITH a powerful Downdraft
Both the Italian Navy and Air Force testified this was a fact (keep this in mind, as these are Governmental agencies, hence are speaking on behalf of the Government itself and steer you towards what the Government WANTS you to believe as “truth”)
But these pesky CCV videos show otherwise
I am a boater myself, and what this video shows, is just a tranquil night with lighting and drizzle, there are NO signs of a “terrible storm”, none whatsoever (BTW, the yacht AIS data show winds of 3.2 knots at time of sinking, meaning barely any wind at all)
Then I have another observation, this latest CCV jumps from 3:55 am directly to 4:02 am, showing only the BEFORE and then the AFTER, never truly showing the “event”
How convenient
And for those with a grain of neurons still active in their brain, you can probably wonder how such a large vessel, holding so much air inside (by volume), sinks in less than 7 minutes, WITHOUT the help of a catastrophic force
By the way, looking at this “event” without understanding WHO died onboard, what were they involved in, with whom, about what, etc, is like narrating that 3 people got crucified 2024 years ago, without giving you the context of who was one of those 3 men
When the lightning illuminates the sky, you see flat seas…..got it ? No storm (wind wise) no Downdraft, that they initially told you was the culprit….. none of the fabricated narratives they served you in a platter are present in this video
For those that have followed this event, this video also contradicts the witness depositions of the German captain of the Sir Roger Baden Powell, AND the lady owner of the boatyard claiming “sails were flapping”, what sails you liar ?
The Bayesian was sunk in order to give a reason of WHY those onboard that HAD to perish, did perish
By whom ? Expert were sent to do so, by whom ? By their government, which one ? That can be an educated guess, and to be clear, is an ally of Italy but way more powerful
Also, at that level, some Governments will be aware and cover each other up
I’m an American, and I can tell you it’s, in my opinion, either the US, British, French or Israeli
Enjoy the rest of your day
BTW, if that statement causes questions and doubts, you should firstly ask yourself how long you want to keep sleeping for, and if perhaps is about time you started to wake up into reality
The Bayesian seems to have been designed in such a way that the cabin doors open outwards rather than inwards. If water flows into the boat, passengers in the cabins can no longer open the door because the water is pressing on the door from outside. The passengers are helplessly trapped.
164 ft
Thank you.
Yes, the unsinkable option sounds great, I'll buy it. It's a Boston Whaler, no worries.
Sorry.. but writing as someone involved in this business for 25 years….you are so totally wrong on the subject of crew on these yachts. The Captains and crew have to hold recognised merchant navy qualifications. On British flagged yachts, the Captain and navigation officers are certified by the MCA ( Marine Coastguard Authority ) . The Captain will be required to hold a 3,000 ton MCA Deck Officers Certificate..and is re tested every five years. The rest of the crew, Deckhands, Stewards / Stewardesses and Chef, have to have STCW. Certificates ( Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping ) , and Sea survival Courses and Fire fighting certificates.. They are professionally trained and qualified. They also under go extensive background checks for obvious security reasons. No Insurance Company would allow anything other than a qualified professional crew anywhere near a vessel of this value, and one that transports high net worth individuals..
Why panic? We all know there are no icebergs off of Sicily! However, in a ship in a serious storm in the dark, head injuries are common.
Perhaps the owner of the shipyard mistook the canopy for the sails flapping.
at 22:03, why they cut 7min of the film?? in the timeline of the cam you can see that it jumps from 3:55, to 4:02, and yes, i am also in your opinion about the reason of sinking.
Long mast compensating for short weenie?
Boat Tampering?
Who are crew?
Cctv?
Connections?
37 minutes after the sinking the survivors launched the rocked-. Once they were on the lifeboat, the crew first started by taking care of the wounds, and launched the rocket once it was done. So no mystery there.
Thank you
You have no idea what you're talking about. This is a ridiculous video.
Great coverage of this tragic sinking of a yacht that was never supposed to sink. Certainly must’ve been terrifying for the people on the boat specially, those that didn’t make it. You seem very knowledgeable about sailing and boats so I appreciated your perspective and hypotheses. I know that you’re covering the volcanoes in Italy. Have you heard that there’s been a lot of increased activity of earthquakes in California and that there hasn’t been a severe earthquake there for about 60 years? I know because I lived through that one. There was another pretty severe one in the 1990s. These were both in Southern California anyway you might want to peek into what’s going on in California with the earthquakes.
Could be a undersea gas pocket, that took the boyentcy. Could explain the quickness as to it's sinking.
I’m confused!! 4:43am and 4:34 am are the times that’s your giving of the flares???
It’s obvious any sailboat with a 246 foot mast taller than any other sailboat. It’s pretty much common sense that this boat is very unstable if it got in to a 40 or 50 not wind 60 wind. The Keel ballast was in the up position, which makes it even more unstable. The captain is not to blame the crew is not to blame the designers are definitely to blame however, the designers are Italian prosecutor is Italian. The crew is all Foreign Prosecutor is looking for a big payday out of this and he’s probably getting money from the yacht builders designers. If not on a first name basis with them, end of story, common sense will tell you don’t go out of your way to be stupid
Not a Boeing right now…😂😂😂😂
Silki are you paying attention to the world? Those not willing to play with the powers that be are deleted. We have an economic crash coming and Morgan Stanley people leaving this plane of existence. There are no coincidences.
Maybe try without the drugs
Those weather events cannot be forecast.
The design and specification of the yacht made it more tender than other more conventional yachts. The crew only survived because they were up top packing away all the sunbeds and seating cushions apparently.
The critical specs are very tight, 45degree pitch etc.
A case of form over function, made lethal because of an unexpected sudden weather event, imho. Very sad.
Thx silki for xour updates👍🏻👍🏻
What im seeing watching the video taken from thevother ship is not the bayesion sinking butba prompt power outage thsts when the mast kugts just flip off. If it had been sinking then onecwould see the mast with these bright lughts move.. but no.. just snap snd its dark.
Also. The wife is alive. She knows what was goung on.. so why not speak up?
ELECTRONICAL? NO SUCH WORD. It is either ELECTRICAL – meaning a device that is run by electricity – in modern context, that would relate to items that run on line (mains) electricity, as opposed to batteries – though technically anything that is powered by electrons is 'electrical'; Or… the device is ELECTRONIC – meaning it has fairly complex electronics involved in its operation – such as mobile phone, laptop, RADAR PPI, radios, transmitters, microwave oven, etc… As a rule, electronic devices require a DC voltage source – ideal for portable devices – or a power supply that rectifies line Alternating Current (AC~) and drops it to lower DC voltages; whereas, an Electrical device itself may only require line AC mains voltage to run – AC electric fan, vacuum cleaner, electric drill, food mixer, spin dryer and standard mains lamps, etc…
IF any of the hull openings were open during the meteorological microburst – especially large hatches – given the height of the mast and IF the retractable keel was 'retracted' then the righting moment of the vessel would be exceeded.
The responsibility of the safety of the ship, its contents, machinery, crew and guests/passengers rests entirely with COMMAND. The Captain, being a fully MCA accredited deck officer should have prepared the ship for bad weather. There would be NO EXCUSE for not knowing what the latest meteorological forecast would be – that ship would probably have 'weatherfax' capability; a dedicated receiver that receives weather bulletins and displays/prints a synoptic chart, or its modern equivalent.
If that keel was retracted and hatches left open in combination with microburst (down-draught) then it's hardly surprising the Bayesian flopped-over and then sank in rapid succession. Add to that a ship load of drunk and/or hung-over people…. A recipe for disaster.
Oh and by the way – NO VESSEL IS UNSINKABLE unless it were made entirely of expanded foam or polystyrene or balsa wood…
I say leave it to the experts!!
And while you were talking about the yacht sinking, along came an advert.. for Ocean Cruises!! Wrong place, wrong time..
DEW full speed!
Why didn’t they just fit airbags to the hull and mast to partially re float it ?
Wasn’t there another boat nearby ?
Unfortunately in my work life , I, ve seen so many allegedly trained people are not worth their salt… boats go down so offen run by allegedly trained staff. .. arrogance & stupidity somewhere