Planurile constructorului de iahturi de a da în judecată WIDOW of Bayesian | SY News Ep389

50 thoughts on “Planurile constructorului de iahturi de a da în judecată WIDOW of Bayesian | SY News Ep389”

1. i thought the ship constructor had denied that, and that the lawyer involved has been booted

2. Means of escape design and criteria is approverà by Lloyds Register. Put the blame fo LR but before be shure to demonstrate that means of escape design was not in compliance with their Rules

3. "WIDOW of Bayesian [sic]" – you're saying that Mike Lynch's yacht was married?!?

4. it will be surprising if that yacht builder will be able to stay in business after this

5. Wow. Way to turn the tables. Come out swinging. Reality cannot be true? A builder suing sailors for sinking their boat and. Revealing the lie that it is unsinkable.

6. Made in Italy

7. that could well backfire! if there was evidence in court there is a good possibility the company would be toast. It increasingly looks like a design flaw.

8. Thank you!

9. Lots of firings of lawyers!
   Can’t represent without consent!

10. Do not order or buy any yachts from Italian Sea Group! Usually it is the buyers suing the sellers. But this case, the seller is suing the buyers. Do you want to buy something and get sued?

11. That dosen’t make any damn sense. Suing someone because they somehow sank there own boat..?

12. This legal action by the boat builder in itself should make it lose business.

13. Disgusting company, her daughter and husband died and he is planning to sue her 😡

14. It sounds like they're probably underwater. I would just buy any other yacht or house or small island , boat people are funny.

15. It was murder, smarter that 90% of the whole world, and billionaires dont just randomly die like this. But unless you people film it, tou wont believe it

16. Didn't they say that The Titanic was unsinkable???

17. Yeah, let’s get the reputation out there that we’re willing to sue our owners that won’t cause anyone to no longer buy our boat sure ha ha

18. The italians dont have heart when it comes to money 💰💰this disaster is extremely unfortunate and sad

19. Blah blah blah..

20. This company sucks and I hope all in-process orders are cancelled.

21. Agree ! Now they project blame on one of the victim! It is incredible! After such an initial statement, they lost all credibility.

22. The Company probably knows it was going to the bottom on this and the 222 Million was a first thought idea to break even. Sounds like the same thought process with PayPal in assessing fines of $2,500 to customers who spoke out on social media that didn’t line up with the owners opinions and when news broke out about it, then said that no one was authorized to release that statement as it was not the intent of PayPal to go forward with this!

23. I’m an engineer not a yacht owner, I know very little about them. Why aren’t vessels such as this equipped with systems that automatically close vents in case of a pronounced list? Seems like it would be simple to implement using current technology.

24. Like a catering service who wants to sue you for getting diarrhea from the food they've made 😒😒

25. If I was rich and famous, I'd be extremely dubious about buying a yacht from these clowns. They sue you when it sinks? Shouldn't it be the other way around?

26. A i AO. arrogant italian AO

27. Jerks. They have WAY more damage to their reputation and future sales by filling that lawsuit than anything widow/crew said. Unbelievable…

28. The analogy to Paul Walker and Porsche is misplaced. We dnk what happened. It was an extreme weather event. No vessel is unsinkable. The captain and surviving crew will blame any malfunctioning equipment as they should. When the vessel comes up, more can be examined and determined. It is poor form for boat maker to sue widow. They may be trying to beat HP to any remaining money of Lynch's. But any sensible buyer would put a hold on a multi million euro purchase until the Italians sort out fault.

29. RECALL is called in automotive. Of course things to point out:
    – exit upper Windows should be in every stage/level of the boat. Hookers or not you have to have a double exit!!!
    – Who decided for anchoring instead of going to port on a storm.
    I am in Lorient with 40 knots, weather Forecast is on every source of info.
    – Who decided to throw a party (alcohol of course) during an electrical storm
    – Who owned the boat and went to deck, not getting everybody UP to Deck. I am with strong winds i woke all my family and my brothers friends and went to safe place until sound gets to normal!
    – if the crew saves 90% and the rich dont just live with the problem of bringing rich people to an unsafer enviroment and just pretend my friend, this is not the sea and nature!

30. I think a lawsuit will be more damaging, jeez how low can you go

31. So if I understand, they didn't really file suit but they are thinking about it?

32. There goes any chance that anyone will ever buy one of their vessels. They have damaged their own reputation themselves, far more than the sinking of the Bayesian, regardless of where fault, if any, lies.

33. Bad business move. Not to mention the stress he's caused to the families

34. I think the yacht builders are pre-empting a huge lawsuit against them by the family group , this matter is far from over. Under whose instructions has lifting of this wreck been stalled.

35. Does anyone, anywhere believe the rogue lawyer story? LOL!

36. We all know that the CIA are behind the sinking and also the killing of his partner CHAMBERLAIN!!! Do you believe in such coincidences?????

37. It simply seems unbelievable that the host of a party on a yacht would not simply say, with a storm hours away, let's get to that dock in sight and ride out the storm there. Or just get hotel rooms for the night, pennies for a billionaire.

38. Would a McGregor 26 with its water ballast empty and keel retracted have sunk under similar circumstances?
    These little boats are cheap enough to sacrifice on in this experiment
    I bet the cheap little boat gets beaten to crap but remains floating like a Coke bottle

39. Easy….everybody thinking or dreaming of buying a yacht just stay away from this company.

40. If his reputation wasn't destroyed before, it is now.

41. Has the management of the Italian Sea Group never heard of the Streisand effect? A lawsuit against a relative of a customer is the last thing that the company needs!

42. The builder is deatly scared of a massive lawsuit which is comming , the builder is playing offense but he who sues last sues best .

43. She just lost her daughter and husband. Like she doesn't have enough to worry about she now has a bunch of leaches on her case. Leave the poor woman alone.

44. They're not going to sue the widow

45. Windows should have been tested by the builder before installing it

46. Clearly a fault of the Italian manufacturer. What a moron the owner of the company is

47. Thank you for the.details

48. Doesn’t seem to be any urgency to actually RAISE the vessel. Is damage to too many reputations likely to occur if vessel is brought to the surface. I understand the total weight of the mast is 28 tons. I imagine the mast when down on the water would never recover .The mast would have pulled the vessel down, with the tip of the mast hitting the seabed first.

49. In a controversial move, a lawyer acting on behalf of TISG filed a lawsuit seeking damages from the widow of the yacht's owner and its crew, claiming reputational harm. However, TISG quickly disavowed the lawsuit, stating that the lawyer had acted without authorization, and the company fired him as a result. They are now focusing on mitigating the public relations fallout and addressing the tragedy in a more appropriate manner​

50. 🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🥀🌹

Comments are closed.