Emisiunea de analiză a aderenței interioare | Cupa Louis Vuitton RD3

Emisiunea de analiză a aderenței interioare | Cupa Louis Vuitton RD3



Nu rata nici un moment… conectează-te cu INEOS Britannia online: Abonează-te la buletin informativ prin https://www.ineosbritannia.com/en/newsletter Urmărește-ne pe Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ineosbritannia Apreciază-ne pe Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/INEOSBritannia Urmărește-ne pe TikTok https://www.tiktok.com/@ineosbritannia Urmărește-ne pe X: https://x.com/ineosbritannia Vizitează site-ul oficial INEOS Britannia : https://www.ineosbritannia.com/

source

22 thoughts on “Emisiunea de analiză a aderenței interioare | Cupa Louis Vuitton RD3

  1. Umpires primary focus and responsibility is safety of the competitors, it’s there in black and white.

    I don’t see how the natural conclusion to decisions not being close enough, to boats getting closer at massive speeds to prove the penalty, will not involve boats getting too close.

  2. turns out that the AC is sailed by different racing right of way rules than normal racing!! Look at thr definition of right of way what tack you are on. Hard to believe a rule as primary as port starboard right of way but they are. Normal tack is defined by main being filled on one side or the other. NOT SO under A"""C rules! By AC rules Its defined by "true wind" on the yacht" Best determiner of that is actually the jib., when the jib starts to come across and is pointed at the mast the tack you are on changes. luna's drivers knew that, Ineos' did not. Who knew?

  3. 9:12 remember, notwithstanding that they are racing

    The *International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea* (COLREGs), also known as the "Rules of the Road," is a set of navigational rules established by the International Maritime Organization (IMO). These rules help ensure the safety of vessels at sea by specifying the conduct of vessels in various situations.

    The COLREG rule you are referring to is *Rule 2**, known as the **Responsibility Rule**. It states that **all vessels* have a responsibility to avoid collisions. Specifically:

    1. *Rule 2(a)* mentions that nothing in the COLREGs shall exonerate any vessel, crew, or operator from the consequences of neglecting to follow the rules, use caution, or act in accordance with the ordinary practice of seamen.
    2. *Rule 2(b)* allows for some discretion, meaning that in exceptional circumstances, a vessel can depart from the rules to avoid immediate danger.

    In summary, Rule 2 places an obligation on all vessels to avoid collisions, regardless of whether they strictly follow the other rules. It emphasizes that safety and the prevention of collisions are the primary responsibility of every vessel.

    So in this situation, notwithstanding the fact that IB was the stand-on vessel they were also in a position to avoid a collision. So they were obliged to keep clear and did. I’d rather see good seamanship than an ego promoted collision.

  4. To me it looks like when Ben Ainslie shows up for interviews he has the attitude of a bully in the principal's office 🤣 really. You say “don't make him angry”, but to us it seems the opposite, that is, when he gets angry he loses clarity.
    Anyway, a great regatta and congratulations to the English for having put us under great pressure until the end.

  5. So it seems Ineos’ protest for the race 4 start was on the basis of rule 11 – on the same tack, overlapped. Why didn’t Ineos protest LR for gybing too close in the race 4 start – rule 15 – acquiring right of way? It’s pretty clear by Ineos’ high-speed crash gybe that LR didn’t give Ineos adequate opportunity to keep clear….

  6. Love your passion on this Freddie – it's incredible as a viewer to watch these races, and just as impressive to see your excitement and love for races such as these in your brief cameo role as an "independent" viewer. Keep it up Bud, a glittering career awaits in sports punditry!! Go RITA!!!

Lasă un răspuns

Follow by Email
YouTube
YouTube
WhatsApp