Tur cu barca cu pânze X Yachts X43

Tur cu barca cu pânze X Yachts X43



Ești interesat de o barcă de croazieră cu performanță de 40 de picioare? Cauți o barcă cu pânze X-Yachts? Alăturați-vă nouă astăzi pentru un tur cu barca cu pânze al noului X-Yachts X43. O barcă de croazieră de lux rapidă cu monococă de 43,5 picioare pe care am putut să o vedem la Newport Boat Show. Are trei opțiuni de chilă, două sau trei configurații de cabină, construcție din fibră de sticlă infuzată cu vid și un catarg în trepte cu chilă. Dacă sunteți la cumpărături cu barca cu pânze, acoperim avantajele și dezavantajele acestei ambarcațiuni de croazieră și o comparăm cu Beneteau Oceanis 40.1, care este aproape jumătate din preț. Practical Sailor este resursa ta de încredere pentru recenzii despre bărci cu pânze și echipamente de navigație. https://www.practical-sailor.com Discutați cu noi pe Facebook! https://www.facebook.com/PracticalSailor/

source

29 thoughts on “Tur cu barca cu pânze X Yachts X43

  1. It's a lovely boat, but only for a very specific group of very well off sailors. Yep, those hatches are silly, but I assume you can afford to "fix" them. Some seats for the helms must be an option, but the single rudder is good. I'm damning this boat with expensively faint praise! Thanks Tim. ⚓

  2. How does this relatively expensive boat square with the channel name "Practical Sailor"?
    What is practical about this boat?

    The video covered other similar sized Beneteau or similarly priced $700,000 boats.

    But did not directly define its purpose nor compare it with other boats with a similar purpose.

  3. Terrible cruising boat. Great race boat! Deep fin keels and spade rudders wide open transoms don’t belong on a cruising boat. (Of course I wouldn’t even buy a bene or Jen ether for cruising

  4. It seems to me that a 6' draft on this boat is probably pushing the stability limits, and attempting to go even shallower would be dangerous for a boat with this much HP. The designers would also need to add even more ballast if reducing draft further – not the best recipe for a performance boat. X Yachts is not attempting to compete with Bahama / ICW designs – they are creating a discriminator for people who care little for those capabilities.

  5. As I'm fond of saying "what you don't see is what you are paying for". The grid system, which used to be galvanized steel but now i believe is carbon fiber, the foam core in the hull and deck. All equates to an exceptionally strong hull.

  6. Love the channel. Understand the focus on the BVIs, ICW and East Coast cruising, but I'm assuming a lot of your viewers are like me – not on the East Coast and more interested in go-fast boats (on a budget). More of that content as well please!

  7. That's a cool boat for the Scandinavians! The rest of the word is much better of with a new Elan E6 or E5 for (less than) HALF of that money, though.

  8. Looking for our first "island hopper" Currently tarrgetting a Catalina 380 with the rear island queen. Having some issues finding other "smaller" boats with island queen beds. Can you help?

  9. I think the question about the Neels is how well do they hold up? What problems do they have? I've learned that everything looks great at the boat show, everything is a nightmare for the first six months, but what's it like after a year or two? And are they really faster sailing than the cats? And what about the teeter totter rocking at anchor?

  10. Hi Tim

    Just traded in our 2003 BENETEAU 423 for a 2014 BENETEAU Oc 45 . I think this will be a good fast cruising boat. Single rudder and hull that is not as flat as the newer models. Time will tell . Love your honest reviews

    Mike and Janice

  11. Interesting comment about the flush ports on the bow being susceptible to spray. However, I was also thinking how nice to have a flat deck to sleep on instead of curling around hatches that "stand proud." Thanks for fine review.

  12. X-yachts has a cruising line, the “XC.” They are better comps for Ben/Jen cruisers. The main sheet is on a traveler forward of the companionway, led back to winches by the dual helms. They are easily single-handed. They are definitely not as roomy below, but have better stowage, and their cockpits seem quite small (some people would say much safer). Fit and finishes are far superior, and the keel-steeped mast with rod rigging to chain plates attached to the steel grid holding the keel are something to behold.
    X has the “XP” line, explicitly for racing (P for performance”, the straight “X” which you reviewed and the XC. The “X” might be called a gentleman’s racer with a sideline in cruising. However, the XC, despite its narrower cruising hull also points at 35° and is astonishingly fast. It isn’t designed for planing, It’s designed to be faster than a flat bottomed boat when not planing. Someone please tell me how many cruisers actually expect to plane their flat-bottomed boats?

Comments are closed.

Follow by Email
YouTube
YouTube
WhatsApp