Incident cisternă militară din SUA | Aveți vreo dovadă de joc nefast? | SY News EP445

32 thoughts on “Incident cisternă militară din SUA | Aveți vreo dovadă de joc nefast? | SY News EP445”

1. This was an attack by russia on a us ship, wft drump? Reason, an act of war.

2. Russian captain

3. I think you do very well, with your reporting regarding incidents. Very good videos, although I do not operate ships, boats or yachts, I watch most of your films. Very informative and as as far as I can tell accuarate. well done.

4. "Bumper cars", … but with ships (?)
   Remember the Ehime Maru (?)

5. Foulplay cound not be ruled out, the other option is massive stupidity.

   Allision was probably used as in lawyereese as 'it wasn't our fault', could not have been our fault. If they used the word collision someone, a lawyer on the other side, could say they were admitting culpability.

6. If the difference between an "allision" and a "collision" is the most grievous error that any nick-picker can find in your reporting, then the rest of us people who are actual adults, certainly need to be thankful for your fabulous reporting. Keep up the good work, with greatly many thanks. Geoff Rohde

7. Job 36:4

   “For truly my words shall not be false: he that is perfect in knowledge is with thee.”

8. LORD please help us, we've been hit.
   That's what he's saying.

9. Any evidence of foul play. Dang me peeps. Wake the beep up..

10. Not just foul play but Act of war. Russian captain and crew.

11. You mean besides the ramming directly at 16 knots?

12. Does this mean 3 oil tankers were hit in recent days?

13. Russian Captain ramming his cargo ship into a Tanker carrying American Military fuel. Foul Play or Act of War?

14. Cyber attack maybe?

15. 1 bbl (barrel) = 42 US Galls
    Common unit of volume for fuel oil.

16. The VDR (voyage data recorders) the 'Black Boxes' will tell all

17. Not an accident – if the collision impact took place at either end of Stena Immaculate we might say itvwas an unfortunate accident but the fact that she was rammed at full speed hitting the anchored vessel mid centre shows she was very probably aimed at and so to attain that accuracy some small course adjustment would have bern needed leading up to ramming – the black boxes will tell all

18. I'm sure this is an 'accident' just as much as I trust that the Russian shadow-fleet has been accidentally cutting all of those undersea data cables…Act of war for sure, but Trump's media is completely ignoring this incident

19. Sooo… gotta ask… why didn’t all that jet fuel melt the steel?

20. The ;smiley face' on the palletized cylinder immediately aft of the collision bulkhead on deck makes the Solong into a large Batman Villain

21. Not an accident. The Russian that is missing set the course to collide, and left the ship That’s why he can’t be found.

22. Anchoring stationary in a known traffic corridor wasn't smart.

23. The shortest distance between two points is a straight line…

24. That ship was T boned right in the middle. It was carrying fuel for the US navy and the captain of the cargo ship is Russian. 3 suspicious pointers to foul play

25. Normally with tankers you just consider the summer deadweight tonnage, in this case the ships 'summer dwt' is 49729 tons – that is the weight of cargo, bunker fuel, fresh water and stores she can lift when fully loaded. In simple terms she is a 50,000 ton tanker.

26. And also, I joined my first ship 3 days shy of 62 years ago. The very first time I ever saw the word 'allision' was on a yachting forum a few years ago.
    I'd leave it to the true pedants that walk amongst us, real sailormen shall continue using 'collision'.

27. You know what, I would not have bothered to respond to the criticism of whether it was a Collision or an Allision. Some people have nothing better to do than make corrections because it makes them feel that they are smarter. Just ignore them. If they are repeat offenders then block them. Problem solved.

28. the US govt is nothing more than an international criminal mafia. the us military are only some of its enforcement thugs

29. Great insight. One question i have that I cannot find film or Text answer to is historical, in the 1700s, when tall ships were anchored away from harbour, boarding crew, passengers and cargo via longboat, how was this done? I'm guessing yard arm and cargo net with platform, but i haven't been able to confirm. I've heard that this kind of thing is dangerous even today, so if anyone can pls point me to a film showing this i would be grateful. I'm researching the raft of the frigate Medusa, which departed Rochfort in 1817 and ran aground due to a bogus pilot and checked out captain.

30. Excellent channel

31. Aren't the ships equipped with navigation software that displays locations of other vessels in an area?

32. Thanks for your great insight into this disaster, some great reporting.

    Also the fact that it costs 600k a month just to maintain a super yacht is crazy stuff.

Comments are closed.