Istoria este un lucru ciudat. În multe cazuri, singurele lucruri pe care le știm despre istorie sunt lucrurile care au fost surprinse în fotografii sau în cărți. În timp ce istoria scrisă poate fi manipulată, fotografiile par a fi singurele lucruri care ne pot informa cu adevărat despre trecut. ▬Conținutul acestui videoclip▬ 00:00 – Introducere 00:56 – Salvador Dali (1953) 02:27 – The Titanic (1912) 05:38 – Montana (1901) 06:02 – Giza (1870) 08:59 – Zero Gravity (1958) 10:18 – La Tour Eiffel (1932) 10:41 – Going for a Stroll (1938) 11:28 – Audrey Hepburn (1958) 12:40 – Space Chimp (1961) 13:05 – Costume de baie (1922) ) 13:30 – Tradiția militară (1952) 14:30 – Citește totul despre ea (1912) 14:52 – Elvis Presley (1958) Îți place acest conținut? Abonați-vă aici: https://www.youtube.com/factsverse?sub_confirmation=1 Sau, vizionați mai multe videoclipuri aici: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLkXAntdjbcSKgHx6EQVOwNKVz1cR2hKVw Veți vedea multe dintre aceste fotografii în istorie cărți. Cu toate acestea, unele dintre aceste fotografii NU sunt potrivite pentru cărțile de istorie și, ca urmare, este posibil să nu le vedeți niciodată. Până astăzi! Am găsit fotografiile nepotrivite din istorie și vă vom arăta și vom discuta de ce nu se găsesc în cărțile de istorie. Fotografii rare nu sunt potrivite pentru cărțile de istorie
source
Fotografii rare nu sunt potrivite pentru cărțile de istorie
46 thoughts on “Fotografii rare nu sunt potrivite pentru cărțile de istorie”
Comments are closed.
Want to be an exclusive member and have access to great MEMBERS-ONLY content? Click here: https://www.youtube.com/c/Factsverse/membership
who's the Indian girl?
Leave it to the commies to place their women on the front lines. I can think of nothing more disrespectful to them. The subversion of socialism must never win.
🙊👁♾⛾⚀🔁
basketball was invented by the mexican tribes you dum%as=. It's even stated in the guiness book of records
Seriously people, then what about those naked statue we get to see in our history books plus those kings/rulers private moment with women's with different positions 🌚.
inappropiate with too many commercials.
diving suit with hyperbaric chamber = 2 in 1.
marilyn monroe at food store yum.always right.
Dislike
I didnt seen anything appropriate to be seen in history books. I think anything from the past should be intered in educational books. There seems to be to much incorrect information being taught to our kids. The tower of the phone lines, that was wild. Seeing all those wires,lol…that was insane.
Historical photos not appropriate for history books? I think the word "historical"pretty much qualifies them for a history book. You don't get to nitpick history.
None of these pictures are inappropriate for school history books as the title suggests or implies.
Thanks for sharing, checkout :
Celebrate Truth
Charles Duffy AKA Tony Starks
31?? for CHESS? Try 32.
So, you give the background info about the photograph, spending 2 to 3 minutes doing so… then flash the photo for about 3 seconds before doing some random cut graphic… you’re a freaking moron. Have the pic up, so we can ACTUALLY LOOK AT IT, don’t hype it then give no time at all to see it. What a pathetic channel.
whats up with the photos?
Cruel assholes using animals for experiments how come they don't use their own children for experiments! Assholes!!!!!
These are all perfectly acceptable for school textbooks. But it was interesting anyway.
I'm amazed that Spielberg was an established director in his 20's. Talk about privilege!
What a waste of time, when am I supposed to see something inappropriate
Merci!
Idiotic
so ! what exactly is "inappropriate " about any of these photo`s ? I`m betting that I am not the only one asking this question !
THIS VIDEO UTTERLY CR A POLA. NOTHING WORTH ANYONE'S TIME! The branding and come-on are stupid… interesting only because there are still people as stupid as I am, who click it!!!!!!
Click bate
Harry Potter was the philosopher's stone, not the sorcerer's stone. If you knew anything about history, you'd know why, but you're obviously too ignorant. The fact that you think these photos are not appropriate for history books also supports that view.
I'm sorry, in what way are these inappropriate?
Woman soldier? Woman runner? How bout female
this video sucks
Cool
Im aware the video cannot surpass the thumbnail.
Im ok with that.
soooooo a photo comes with better odds of portraying the truth?
what the HELL is 'inappropriate' for history books about THAT???????
A lot of the pictures have been well circulated.
So, umm, where is the photo and back story of the sexy looking native american lady? Did she lead a famous battle or sit at an important meeting that changed history? Please let us know the factorial details FV!
Never watch any channel that has a black circle with letters in it. You will be disappointed.
Only thing inappropriate is the exaggerated statement to lure others to watch this video
wheres the hot female indian??????
Only lies and twisted truths are appropriate for HIS STORY books
The Statue of Liberty one is in my us history book😂
You need to practice your pronunciation of foreign names and words before recording.
0:07 THIS PHOTO IS NOT TALKED ABOUT IN THE VIDEO.
WHAT?! A word about that soviet woman-soldier… In 1940 she wasn't fighting nazis, but adoring them – because they were allies! Germany and Russia attacked Poland in September 1939 and occupied Polish territory.
Downvoted for the title and lack of research on topics, full of errors.
How could France give such wonder 🤔
To a democracies lie.
Liberty should be dismantled and sent back to French providence.
Neither Librarians in PROPAGANDA
Lived up to the Statue of Liberty's representative
You should headline these "Dumbass Pictures Not Worth Your Time"